Therefore technically I was correct in saying the support bonus is weaker as units get more powerful late game. That's a difference of 13, or damage of ~50 as opposed to Battleship + 1 support (CS: 62) defending vs Battleship (CS: 60) which would be ~32. Let's say in the case of a Frigate target assuming at least one support (CS: 45+2) vs Battleship (CS: 60) attacker. The tradeoff is old era support units will probably get attacked first, and in terms of damage, will get hurt more. If you are flanking with unit of an earlier era than the target unit, you still get the +2 CS flanking bonus regardless. Early game, you don't really have an option of flanking with a cheaper unit, eg because you can't move into ocean tiles with the cheaper unit.Ģ. What I was trying to explain, concisely, is two things.ġ. I was correct in saying that it's a flat +2 per flanking tile in all eras.
Okay, I should have written that differently. Or, in other words, 77 vs 75 will do exactly the same damage as 22 vs 20. +2 will add exactly the same amount of damage at any point in the game. it's just flat +2 combat strength per tile surrounding the target unit (as opposed to Civ5, where it scaled up by percentage - 10%/15% bonus to combat strength of the attacking unit)No.Ĭombat in this game is not based on the proportion of the combat strengths involved, it's based on the difference between the combat strengths. Originally posted by King Buzzo:I think it's more of a question of flanking.įlanking/support bonus is weaker as the units get more powerful in Civ6.
0 kommentar(er)
